失业生
‘Hong Kong Alliance’ found guilty of inciting subversion; verdict clarifies boundaries between free speech and national security_我的网站
一 | 随着新加坡轿车越来越多，发生交通事故的概率也更大了。
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported.
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong.
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported.
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said.
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued.
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said.
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday.
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said.
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday.
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said.
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added.
。据警方公布的数据显示，今年上半年，本地共发生3487起导致伤亡的车祸，有4702人在交通事故中伤亡......图源：police.gov.sg如果，真的不幸遭遇道路交通事故，我们应该怎么做，才能最大程度保证自己的安全，以及该如何索赔呢？椰子为大家整理了一份详细的，交通事故后的措施指南。第一步：确保人身安全1）检查有无人员伤亡事故发生后的第一时间，先检查自己是否受伤，并评估同行人士的状况。本着“先保障自己，再考虑帮助同行人士”的原则来进行以下操作↓2）如果有人受伤，先判断要不要移动伤者等危急情况下，例如伤者所在的位置着火了，或有燃油泄漏等情况，需要先将伤者移动到安全区域。无危急情况，且伤者看起来已经陷入昏迷或休克的，不要轻易移动他们，这可能会导致伤者经历二次伤害。示意图3） 有人受伤，需要呼叫警察和救护车救援，之后的事情就交给警察处理拨打995呼叫救护车，或者拨打1777呼叫非紧急救护车。拨打999呼叫警察，等待专业人士抵达现场处理事故。注意：如果车祸比较严重，那么即便感觉自己没有外伤，也需要去医院检查。
二 | 因为严重的内伤会激发肾上腺素，看起来好像没事，这种情况其实会更加危险！示意图 图源：早报第二步：确保现场安全在保证自己与同行人员安全，并且事故不是很严重，下一步就是保护现场，避免发生二次事故。如果是车祸，并且你是车主，那么需要进行以下操作：1）打开危险信号灯，示意来往车辆。2）在汽车安全距离的位置放置三角警示牌或者交通锥，以便更好地警示车辆。
三 | （如果车上有这些装备的话）示意图3）拍照记录现场情况，方便还原事发状况，以及后续保险索赔。照片要包含以下内容。整体图像，用广角镜头拍下事故现场，包括周围的区域局部图像，包括刹车痕迹，以及现场碎片的特写。碰撞接触区域的特写画面，最好画面能有自己的车牌号其他涉事车辆的车牌照片注意：在此期间，不要挪动车辆。保护现场才能更好划分责任，以便更好进行后续的保险理赔。图源：gia.org.sg4）向现场目击者求助。如果有行车记录仪，事情会更为简单。如果没有，也可以现场找目击证人为自己作证，具体操作如下：礼貌向现场的目击者是否看到事发的经过。
四 | 向他们解释，自己需要目击者的帮助。
五 | 简单记录他们描述的现场情况询问他们的联系方式，后期保险理赔或者需要他们重复描述现场。注意：一切以人身安全为主，不要为了收集证人信息让自己陷入危险之中，这些只是方便后续理赔。如果有人受伤，可以报警，请警察去查。示意图第三步：收集现场信息根据新加坡汽车索赔框架 (MCF)，发生交通事故后，需要与涉及事故的所有人员交换联系方式，以及以下信息：基础信息，包括姓名、身份证号、手机号、居住地址保险信息：保险公司信息，以及保单号图源：gia.org.sg随后，直接致电自己保险公司，呼叫道路道路援助到现场。
六 | 图源：gia.org.sg第四步：报告事故根据相关要求，车主必须在事发的24小时内，向交警报告或保险公司提交事故报告。
七 | 1）如果没有及时提交报告，可能产生以下严重后果：保险公司可能回拒绝赔偿影响无索赔折扣（NCD），导致续保费用上涨甚至会导致保险公司拒绝续保。2）如果出现以下任意情况，需要在24小时内向交警报告有人因事故死亡车辆起火公共设施受损涉及有外国车辆涉及政府车辆涉及行人或骑行者有人肇事逃逸有人受伤（至少一人被救护车送至医院）示意图3）报告中应包含以下重要信息事故地点事故日期及时间事故时的天气和道路状况关于事故的简单陈述了解这些后，大家如果真遇到了交通事故，也不知道手足无措。不过，椰子还是希望大家，每天都平安归家，用不上这份指南。
Current article:http://fj5.ningshunsaotuiqiao.shop/list_feg4/ptbyg.html
Published on:02:52:51