三世情缘
绿党联合党魁竞选拉开帷幕，她率先宣布参选！_我的网站
一 |
Some Indian media outlets and regional political forces have recently sought to amplify allegations of an unverified China-India border confrontation, while official signals from Beijing and New Delhi have emphasized stability, communication and the importance of managing differences through established mechanisms.
The contrasting narratives have emerged at a moment when exchanges between China and India in various fields have gradually resumed, and cooperation has been advanced in an orderly manner, Chinese experts noted, warning that sensationalizing border-related claims could disrupt the hard-won momentum in bilateral ties and the two countries should prevent the boundary question from hijacking their broader relationship.
Contrasting narratives
The latest media speculation was partly triggered by claims made by the People's Party of the so-called "Arunachal Pradesh" (PPA), a regional Indian political party. According to The Arunachal Times, a local Indian newspaper, a four-member PPA "fact-finding committee" led by former minister and party adviser Kahfa Bengia visited the so-called "Taksing area" (known as Taxin, in Zangnan, Southwest China's Xizang Autonomous Region) on July 10 and subsequently alleged that Indian forces had been prevented from accessing several patrolling points.
The claims were then amplified by Indian news outlet ThePrint, which reported on Tuesday, citing unnamed sources, that Chinese and Indian patrols had allegedly come "face to face" near Taxin in late July.
The outlet further claimed that Chinese personnel subsequently left before returning in early August and setting up "two or three tents."
However, ThePrint acknowledged that sources in India's defense and security establishment said the "situation was well under control."
Some other Indian reports have also questioned the sensational allegations. India Today reported on Wednesday that Indian government sources dismissed social media claims circulating about what was described as "slow encroachment," while noting that similar allegations regarding the area had previously been rejected by local authorities and the Indian Army.
In fact, the claims stand in contrast to the official diplomatic signals coming from both sides.
Asked on Tuesday about reports concerning the border, Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said New Delhi takes border matters seriously and reiterated India's position that "the state of the border affairs will reflect on the state of our larger bilateral ties," according to a media briefing released by the ministry on its website on Tuesday.
He also referred to existing mechanisms for dealing with border issues and preventing misunderstanding and miscalculation, according to the briefing.
Responding on Wednesday to questions from Bloomberg and Reuters concerning social media claims about stepped-up Chinese military activity and a possible new border incident, Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, "The China-India border situation is generally stable at the moment."
"China and India held the 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination (WMCC) on China-India Border Affairs last week. The two sides agreed to maintain communication via diplomatic and military channels and jointly uphold peace and tranquility in the border areas," Guo said.
Qian Feng, director of the Research Department at Tsinghua University's National Strategy Institute, told the Global Times on Thursday that the fact that the two sides continue to communicate through established channels shows that the border situation has not developed in the direction of escalation portrayed by some Indian media.
Such hype also came amid another development concerning Zangnan. India on August 7 announced what it called "standard" names for 27 locations in so-called "Arunachal Pradesh," a move that some Indian media outlets portrayed as an effort to counter China and further connected with the latest reports of border tensions.
China has firmly rejected the move. Responding to the issue on Monday, spokesperson Guo said, "Zangnan region is China's territory. China does not recognize the so-called 'Arunachal Pradesh' illegally set up by India."
Guo said India's attempt to replace names long used by China with its so-called "standard names" is "illegal, null and void," and stressed that it would not change the fact that Zangnan belongs to China.
Hu Zhiyong, a professor from Zhejiang International Studies University and a research fellow at the Institute of International Relations at the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Thursday that border and security issues have traditionally been susceptible to political manipulation in India's domestic politics. "When domestic economic and social problems become difficult to address, issues involving the borders with China or Pakistan can easily be pushed to the forefront to divert public attention," Hu explained.
He said economic pressures, concerns over foreign investment and the domestic business environment, together with accumulated public sentiment, could provide incentives for some political forces to magnify external disputes.
Hu argued that another problem lies in the tendency of some Indian political figures to bind the boundary question too closely to the entire China-India relationship. "The boundary issue is one part of bilateral relations, which also encompass political, economic, diplomatic, security and people-to-people exchanges," Hu said. "It should not be allowed to hijack the entire relationship."
Dialogue matters
According to the Chinese Foreign Ministry's statement of the August 6 meeting, the two sides conducted constructive dialogue in a candid and friendly manner, had an in-depth exchange of views on further implementing the consensus reached during the 24th Round of Talks between the Special Representatives of China and India on the Boundary Question, and agreed to jointly prepare for the coming 25th Round of SR talks. The two sides also discussed boundary delimitation, border management, mechanism development, cross-border exchange and cooperation. The two sides agreed to continue to maintain diplomatic and military communication, and jointly safeguard peace and tranquility in the border areas.
Hu pointed out that the timing of the latest speculation is noteworthy, as border issues have at times been used by some forces in India in an attempt to gain leverage ahead of important bilateral interactions.
The 36th WMCC meeting demonstrates that the two sides possess functioning channels through which disagreements can be addressed. This is particularly important as China and India seek to sustain the improvement in relations and prepare for further high-level interactions, said Chinese observers.
"The boundary dispute is a complicated issue left over from history and cannot be resolved overnight," Qian said. "What matters is to keep diplomatic and military communication channels open, promptly handle frontline frictions through established mechanisms, expand people-to-people exchanges and strengthen coordination under multilateral frameworks such as BRICS and the SCO."
。
二 | Sophie 编译 Chlöe Swarbrick宣布角逐绿党联合党魁一职，证实了广泛的猜测。
三 | James Shaw本周宣布将辞职，绿党将有一个联合党魁的职位空缺。 Advertise with us 无论谁担任这一职位，都将与另一位联合党魁Marama Davidson密切合作。 Swarbrick今早在国会宣布参选。 “我是一名自豪的绿党成员。
四 | 我们比任何其他政党都更明白，社区中存在的领导力远远超过所谓的权力大厅。我在这里是为了服务我的社区。” “在过去的三天里，他们要求我站出来，争取这个职位。” “如果成为联合党魁，我想告诉这个国家的每一个人，他们拥有可以选择我们未来的力量。
五 | ” 1News昨天报道了Swarbrick有望竞选该职位。 此前，她一直在与党团会议的同事和朋友讨论她是否应该参加竞选。 “毫无疑问，我从来没有渴望过这样的东西，我真正坚持的理念比任何一个人都重要。所以我更关注党派，而不是我自己。”Swarbrick周三说。 该职位的提名将于2月14日截止，新的联合党魁预计将于3月10日宣布。 Swarbrick说：“传统的、渐进式的政治已经无法应对我们面临的挑战——那些交织在一起的气候、不平等、生物多样性和住房危机。我们不能把政治交给政客。” “接下来的几个星期里，我将与绿党成员讨论我对未来行动的愿景，并请求他们信任我。” “如果我当选，我将与Marama Davidson共同努力，我将推动绿党的行动，实现切实的、现实的、以人为本的变革——就像我一直以来所做的那样——但现在，规模更大。” Swarbrick还抨击了政府的“残酷议程”，并表示她将致力于实现“我们国家的第一个由绿党主导的政府”。 还有谁可能参加竞选？ Swarbrick将是最突出的竞争者，她目前在绿党名单上排名第三，但她可能面临竞争。 上次大选中排名第五的议员Teanau Tuiono，曾在两年前公开表示考虑竞选党魁职务。 Julie Anne Genter也可能参加竞选，她是党团会议中任职时间最长的议员。 另一位知名的国会议员Ricardo Menéndez March表示，他不打算报名竞选。
六 | 工党党魁Chris Hipkins说，下一任联合党魁是绿党的事，但当被追问时，他说他认为“很可能”是Swarbrick。 联合党魁如何产生？ 绿党成员将在提名结束后的地方会议上投票选出他们喜欢的候选人。
七 | 每个分会有权获得一定数量的选票，与该地区的成员数量成比例。 过去，绿党要求一位联合党魁是男性，另一位是女性，但这在2022年改变了。 现在，对联合党魁的要求是，其中必须有一名女性，另一位可以是任何性别。 该党还规定，必须有一位联合党魁是毛利人。Marama Davidson同时满足了这两个要求。
八 | 3月10日之后，无论谁得到该职位，每年都将面临考验，绿党的联合党魁在每年的年度大会上选举产生。
九 | 相关阅读： 突发！James Shaw将辞去绿党联合党魁一职 注：本文为编译/原创，欢迎转发分享；但严禁复制等未经授权的非法使用。违反上述声明者，本网将追究其相关法律责任。使用授权请联系[email protected]。 chineseherald.co.nz All Rights Reserved 版权所有 (责编：Sophie) 相关内容 奥克兰海啸疏散地图最新版发布！这些地方风险最大！ 深夜开着偷来的汽车高速逃逸，五名奥克兰青少年被拘留 秋意突袭，本周末全国湿冷多风，但是，夏天远没有过去…… 新年首月道路死亡人数创记录，考驾照要加大难度？ 前绿党议员涉嫌偷走近10000纽币商品，最高可判7年监禁 奥克兰高温警报！全国部分地区迎来热浪 今晨北岛发生致命车祸，至少两人死亡 新西兰中小学迎来巨变！美情报官员在惠灵顿秘密开会……。
Current article:http://fj5.ningshunsaotuiqiao.shop/list_rwu/65al.html
Published on:13:52:06