文章ID：9813

天下无双

男子吃了眼镜蛇后反手举报商家卖野味，双双被罚_我的网站

天地传说之鱼美人

A |

顾客明知是野生蛇类仍然下单食用，吃完后立即举报商家，要求退赔款项并查处餐馆违法行为。 "About seven lakh [700,000 ] people across 1,618 villages remain affected. Out of these, 2.78 lakh [278,000] people are in 413 relief camps," a spokesperson of the Assam State Disaster Management Authority (ASDMA) said on Sunday, as quoted by The Hindu newspaper.,#Assam flood: 5 more die, over 18.35 lakh people still affected pic.twitter.com/8jzF6Bu9l8— BroidNewsTV (@BroidNewsTV) July 4, 2022,According to the spokesperson, five more people were reported drowned or washed away over the past 24-hour period, while another 18 were killed by landslides. The total death toll from the natural disaster in Assam stands at 179.,जहां न पहुंचे सरकार, वहां पहुंचे सरदार#AssamFloods pic.twitter.com/uQ29MA2ohz— RAJKUMAR YADAV (@RAJKUMA19919264) July 4, 2022,Around 138,000 houses have been partially or fully destroyed by floods in Assam and over 47,100 hectares of cropland have been flooded.,At the end of June, Indian media reported that about 5.5 million people had been affected by floods and landslides in Assam, with the death toll standing at around 89.,The floods were reportedly caused by heavy rains continuing for over two weeks, as a result of which the Brahmaputra and Barak rivers burst their banks and flooded most of the state. By June 19, about 528.5 millimeters (20.8 inches) of rain (109% monthly average), fell in the state, according to the Indian meteorological department.,A total of 26 districts remain affected by the floods.。事后，商家被予以行政处罚，市场监管部门也对举报人开出了罚单。举报人对此不服，一纸诉状告上法院，声称是为了取证才食用野生动物。广州铁路运输中级法院8月19日透露，法院审理后判决驳回举报人诉讼请求。

明知是野生蛇类仍下单食用

市场监管部门依法处罚2024年3月20日晚，张某（化名）与朋友前往广州市某餐馆用餐，在进店前即开始拍摄。进入餐馆落座后，张某向服务员称其通过网络得知该店有水蛇粥，服务员当时称没有水蛇粥、但有眼镜蛇，双方商量好价格及制作方法后，张某同意餐馆制作加工眼镜蛇并食用。

B | 三日后，张某向市场监管部门邮寄投诉举报材料，称其于2024年3月20日在某餐馆用餐时选购一份眼镜蛇，其认为餐馆非法销售野生动物的行为违反了相关法律规定，故要求退赔款项并查处餐馆违法行为。同年4月8日，市场监管部门对张某涉嫌食用野生动物案决定予以立案。

C | 经鉴定，涉案野生动物制作的食品来源于蛇类动物。7月4日，市场监管部门向张某作出被诉《行政处罚决定书》，以张某食用蛇类野生动物行为违反了《广州市禁止滥食野生动物条例》第二条第一款第（一）项规定为由，作出罚款的行政处罚。张某不服，经申请行政复议被维持后诉至法院。庭审中，市场监管部门述称已对涉事餐馆作出行政处罚。一审法院判决驳回张某的诉讼请求。